Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
RNR · NYSE · STOCK

RenaissanceRe (RNR) Stock Analysis

Financial Services Updated September 22, 2026
$325.88
52W $231.17 – $340.24
66/100
$13.56B
5.6
0.17
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
66/100
Conviction: High · 83% agreement · 6 analysts
+2.9%
-11.8%
0.25:1
High
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.

Is RNR Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates RenaissanceRe (RNR) Buy with a composite score of 66/100 , based on 6 analysts with 83% agreement. Last updated September 22, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +9.25 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -10.75 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The primary driver is vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. The main limiting factor is revenue declining -9.1% yoy -- this is not a growth story right now. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • P/E of 5.2 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
  • Price-to-book of 1.1x is a discount to asset value — Value
  • ROE of 22.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
  • EPS growing 48.0% YoY — Growth
  • 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
  • Revenue declining -9.1% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
  • Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
  • Current ratio of 0.63 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of September 22, 2026
Overall Committee Score
66/100
Agreement
83%
Analysts
6
Conviction
High
Sector Rank
Top 32%
of 211 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst bullish
76 / 100 · High confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ P/E of 5.2 is inexpensive for the broad market
Growth Analyst neutral
54 / 100 · High confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ EPS growing 48.0% YoY
− Revenue declining -9.1% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now
Technical Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst bullish
62 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Risk profile is manageable -- leverage, volatility, and event exposure all look contained
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.20) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
− Current ratio of 0.63 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion
Macro Analyst bullish
80 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking
News Analyst bullish
62 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
Portfolio Manager neutral
55 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 63.3 to 65.8.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: score 65->80 (+15); +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: score 45->55 (+10); +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-22 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
46.1
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.502
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$287.88
Resistance
$335.91
Bollinger %B
0.32
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$327.60 Below
EMA 21
$327.02 Below
EMA 50
$322.98 Above
EMA 200
$301.67 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
100
Growth
74
Profitability
87
Financial Health
90
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 5.6×
P/B Ratio 1.14×
PEG Ratio 0.11
Dividend Yield 0.50%
52W High $340.24
52W Low $231.17
Quality & Growth
ROE 2310.6%
ROA 498.6%
Gross Margin 5856.4%
Operating Margin 3877.2%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 0.20
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 5.6 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.1x; PEG ratio of 0.1 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 23.1%; Return on assets of 5.0%; Net margin of 24.7%; Gross margin of 58.6%; Current ratio of 1.76 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.20; Free cash flow per share is positive (87.14); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 11.0%; 5 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+3.1% -> -6.0% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full RNR Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime