Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
SF · NYSE · STOCK

Stifel (SF) Stock Analysis

Financial Services Updated September 22, 2026
$73.17
52W $67.81 – $89.83
58/100
$11.48B
8.3
0.98
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
58/100
Conviction: Contested · 67% agreement · 6 analysts
+3.3%
-0.2%
20.62:1
Contested

Is SF Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates Stifel (SF) Buy with a composite score of 58/100 , based on 6 analysts with 67% agreement. Last updated September 22, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +16.57 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -3.43 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 5.33) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • P/E of 12.0 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
  • ROE of 16.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
  • 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
  • VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
Bear Case
  • Debt-to-equity of 5.33 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
  • RSI at 24 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup) — Technical
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
  • High leverage (debt-to-equity 5.33) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
  • Current ratio of 0.12 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of September 22, 2026
Overall Committee Score
58/100
Agreement
67%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 72%
of 211 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ P/E of 12.0 is inexpensive for the broad market
− Debt-to-equity of 5.33 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case
Growth Analyst bullish
77 / 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution
Technical Analyst bearish
38 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is deteriorating -- trend and/or momentum are working against this name
− RSI at 24 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup)
Risk Analyst bearish
32 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 5.33) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst bullish
80 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking
News Analyst bullish
62 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
Portfolio Manager neutral
55 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 55.9 to 58.4.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: score 65->80 (+15); +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: score 45->55 (+10); +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Technical Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-22 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
24.2
Oversold
MACD Histogram
-0.581
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$75.59
Resistance
$78.21
Bollinger %B
0.10
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$77.19 Below
EMA 21
$78.85 Below
EMA 50
$79.19 Below
EMA 200
$77.33 Below

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
100
Growth
76
Profitability
61
Financial Health
100
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 8.3×
P/B Ratio 1.29×
PEG Ratio 0.13
Dividend Yield 1.75%
52W High $89.83
52W Low $67.81
Quality & Growth
ROE 1144.0%
ROA 164.4%
Gross Margin 8493.0%
Operating Margin 2451.8%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 0.14
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 8.3 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.3x; PEG ratio of 0.1 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 11.4%; Return on assets of 1.6%; Net margin of 14.3%; Gross margin of 84.9%; Current ratio of 4.44 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.14; Free cash flow per share is positive (4.06); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 3.0%; 5 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth accelerating (-17.3% -> -2.1% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 24.6%; Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full SF Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime