Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
AFRM · NASDAQ · STOCK

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) Stock Analysis

Financial Services Updated August 23, 2026
$77.00
52W $42.09 – $100.00
60/100
$25.80B
67.0
3.62
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
60/100
Conviction: Contested · 67% agreement · 6 analysts
+3.0%
-21.7%
0.14:1
Contested
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.

Is AFRM Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates Affirm Holdings (AFRM) Buy with a composite score of 60/100 , based on 6 analysts with 67% agreement. Last updated August 23, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +15.34 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -4.66 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.67 across 3 articles, 14d). Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 68.6 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • Revenue growing 32.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
  • 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
  • MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
  • Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
  • News sentiment is positive (+0.67 across 3 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
  • P/E of 68.6 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
  • Price-to-book of 7.3x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • Debt-to-equity of 2.48 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
  • Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
  • High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.48) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of August 23, 2026
Overall Committee Score
60/100
Agreement
67%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 51%
of 211 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst bearish
28 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
− P/E of 68.6 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst bullish
67 / 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 32.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst bullish
69 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
Risk Analyst neutral
50 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate risk -- no single red flag, but nothing that clearly de-risks the position either
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.48) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst bullish
79 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.67 across 3 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager neutral
45 / 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 3069.37)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 59.7 to 59.7.

Comparing 2026-08-22 to 2026-08-23 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
53.9
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.095
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$60.31
Resistance
$79.30
Bollinger %B
0.68
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$75.96 Above
EMA 21
$75.85 Above
EMA 50
$74.56 Above
EMA 200
$68.18 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
39
Growth
69
Profitability
40
Financial Health
54
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 67.0×
P/B Ratio 6.86×
PEG Ratio 0.03
Dividend Yield 0.00%
52W High $100.00
52W Low $42.09
Quality & Growth
ROE 170.0%
ROA 46.8%
Gross Margin 6771.5%
Operating Margin 1111.8%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 2.36
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 67.0 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 6.9x; PEG ratio of 0.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 1.7%; Return on assets of 0.5%; Net margin of 9.6%; Gross margin of 67.7%; Current ratio of 717.01 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 2.36; Free cash flow per share is positive (2.33); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 53.5%; 4 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+60.9% -> -18.9% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full AFRM Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime