AFRM · NASDAQ · STOCK
Affirm Holdings (AFRM) Stock Analysis
$71.58
52W $42.09 – $92.56
59/100
$24.14B
12.6
3.61
⚠
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.
Is AFRM Bullish or Bearish?
Bullish.
Innellis AI committee rates Affirm Holdings (AFRM) Buy with a composite score of 59/100
, based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement.
Last updated September 17, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Strong Buy
- Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +16.18 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Watch
- Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -3.82 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 32.1% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 1.79) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- P/E of 12.8 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 47.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 32.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 5459.7% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 5.0x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 1.79 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.79) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
- Bollinger bandwidth of 16.7% signals elevated volatility — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of September 17, 2026
Overall Committee Score
59/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 58%
of 211 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst
neutral
55
/ 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ P/E of 12.8 is inexpensive for the broad market
− Price-to-book of 5.0x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst
bullish
84
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 32.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
Technical Analyst
neutral
48
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.79) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
bullish
65
/ 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst
bullish
68
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 39 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2514.55)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 58.8 to 58.8.
Comparing 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-17 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
47.6
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.243
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$69.66
Resistance
$73.31
Bollinger %B
0.34
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$72.04
Below
EMA 21
$73.33
Below
EMA 50
$73.88
Below
EMA 200
$68.96
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
85
Growth
95
Profitability
100
Financial Health
68
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio
12.6×
P/B Ratio
4.46×
PEG Ratio
0.00
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$92.56
52W Low
$42.09
Quality & Growth
ROE
3519.1%
ROA
1222.2%
Gross Margin
6815.0%
Operating Margin
1550.3%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
1.79
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 12.6 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 4.5x; PEG ratio of 0.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 35.2%; Return on assets of 12.2%; Net margin of 46.1%; Gross margin of 68.1%; Current ratio of 12.73 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 1.79; Free cash flow per share is positive (2.93); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 1218.5%; 5 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth accelerating (-18.9% -> +1440.0% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 2210.0%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full AFRM Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →