Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
UPST · NASDAQ · STOCK

Upstart Holdings

Financial Services Updated August 09, 2026
$30.73
52W $23.96 – $76.95
55/100
$2.98B
50.0
2.17
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
55/100
Conviction: Contested · 50% agreement · 6 analysts
+15.1%
-15.7%
0.96:1
Contested
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.

Is UPST Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates Upstart Holdings (UPST) Buy with a composite score of 55/100 , based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement. Last updated August 09, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +19.53 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -0.47 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 46.3% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 50.1 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • Revenue growing 46.3% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
  • MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
  • Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
  • Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
  • Beta of 2.48 means this name should amplify a favorable market regime — Macro
Bear Case
  • P/E of 50.1 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
  • Price-to-book of 5.3x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • Debt-to-equity of 2.29 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
  • Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
  • Price structure (HH_HL) contradicts the downtrend -- mixed signals — Technical
  • High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.29) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of August 09, 2026
Overall Committee Score
55/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 87%
of 142 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst bearish
28 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
− P/E of 50.1 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst bullish
85 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 46.3% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
Technical Analyst neutral
53 / 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst bearish
32 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.29) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst bullish
70 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst bullish
64 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 16 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager neutral
55 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 55.5 to 55.5.

Analyst-level changes:
  • News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-08-08 to 2026-08-09 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
65.8
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.387
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$26.23
Resistance
$35.80
Bollinger %B
0.79
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$29.49 Above
EMA 21
$29.67 Above
EMA 50
$30.42 Above
EMA 200
$36.28 Below

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
55
Growth
85
Profitability
44
Financial Health
35
Cash Flow
15
Valuation
P/E Ratio 50.0×
P/B Ratio 3.76×
PEG Ratio 0.04
Dividend Yield 0.00%
52W High $76.95
52W Low $23.96
Quality & Growth
ROE 671.0%
ROA 180.2%
Gross Margin 7444.1%
Operating Margin 416.4%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 2.49
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 50.0 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 3.8x; PEG ratio of 0.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 6.7%; Return on assets of 1.8%; Net margin of 5.2%; Gross margin of 74.4%; Current ratio of 1.64 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 2.49; Free cash flow per share is negative (-4.52); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 8.3%; EPS growth accelerating (-34.8% -> +96.7% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 63.9%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full UPST Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →

Explore UPST Further

📈 Rating History 💰 Earnings 📰 Recent Events 🔄 What Changed 📖 Thesis Evolution 🔍 Similar Stocks
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime