Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
APA · NASDAQ · STOCK

APA Corporation

Energy Updated August 08, 2026
$37.64
52W $19.77 – $45.66
60/100
$13.30B
8.0
0.35
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
60/100
Conviction: Contested · 67% agreement · 6 analysts
+0.4%
-2.1%
0.19:1
Contested
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.

Is APA Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates APA Corporation (APA) Buy with a composite score of 60/100 , based on 6 analysts with 67% agreement. Last updated August 08, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +14.68 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -5.32 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Value Analyst sees a compelling case — p/e of 8.7 is inexpensive for the broad market. Risk Analyst remains cautious — current ratio of 0.82 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • P/E of 8.7 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
  • Price-to-book of 1.4x is a discount to asset value — Value
  • ROE of 25.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
  • Dividend yield of 2.7% pays you to wait — Value
  • EPS growing 55.2% YoY — Growth
  • 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
  • Revenue declining -17.4% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
  • Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
  • Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical
  • Current ratio of 0.82 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of August 08, 2026
Overall Committee Score
60/100
Agreement
67%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 47%
of 40 Energy peers
Value Analyst bullish
78 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ P/E of 8.7 is inexpensive for the broad market
Growth Analyst neutral
54 / 100 · High confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ EPS growing 55.2% YoY
− Revenue declining -17.4% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now
Technical Analyst bullish
63 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals
Risk Analyst bearish
35 / 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− Current ratio of 0.82 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion
Macro Analyst bullish
70 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst bullish
62 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
Portfolio Manager neutral
55 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 60.7 to 60.3.

Comparing 2026-08-07 to 2026-08-08 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
62.9
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.146
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Support
$36.85
Resistance
$37.79
Bollinger %B
0.96
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$36.30 Above
EMA 21
$35.75 Above
EMA 50
$35.61 Above
EMA 200
$32.37 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
98
Growth
76
Profitability
79
Financial Health
55
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 8.0×
P/B Ratio 1.89×
PEG Ratio 0.14
Dividend Yield 2.66%
52W High $45.66
52W Low $19.77
Quality & Growth
ROE 2353.5%
ROA 754.8%
Gross Margin 3876.8%
Operating Margin 1184.3%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 0.55
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 8.0 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.9x; PEG ratio of 0.1 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 23.5%; Return on assets of 7.5%; Net margin of 19.0%; Gross margin of 38.8%; Current ratio of 0.95 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.55; Free cash flow per share is positive (6.01); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 0.2%; 5 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+51.6% -> +37.0% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 117.2%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full APA Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →

Explore APA Further

📈 Rating History 💰 Earnings 📰 Recent Events 🔄 What Changed 📖 Thesis Evolution 🔍 Similar Stocks
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime