Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
CNQ · NYSE · STOCK

Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) Stock Analysis

Energy Updated October 14, 2026
$52.12
52W $29.68 – $52.31
63/100
$105.33B
12.5
0.94
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
63/100
Conviction: Contested · 83% agreement · 6 analysts
+0.8%
-18.7%
0.04:1
Contested
⚠
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.

Is CNQ Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) Buy with a composite score of 63/100 , based on 6 analysts with 83% agreement. Last updated October 14, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +12.27 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -7.73 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — eps growing 42.9% yoy. Risk Analyst remains cautious — current ratio of 0.95 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • P/E of 13.0 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
  • ROE of 26.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
  • Dividend yield of 4.5% pays you to wait — Value
  • EPS growing 42.9% YoY — Growth
  • 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
  • RSI at 79 is in overbought territory — Technical
  • Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
  • Current ratio of 0.95 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 14, 2026
Overall Committee Score
63/100
Agreement
83%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 23%
of 93 Energy peers
Value Analyst bullish
70 / 100 · High confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ P/E of 13.0 is inexpensive for the broad market
Growth Analyst bullish
79 / 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ EPS growing 42.9% YoY
Technical Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− RSI at 79 is in overbought territory
Risk Analyst bearish
35 / 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− Current ratio of 0.95 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst bullish
66 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 11 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager bearish
35 / 100 · Low confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 64.6 to 62.7.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: score 80->65 (-15).
  • News Analyst: score 63->66 (+4); +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: score 30->35 (+5).
  • Technical Analyst: +2 bearish signal(s); +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Value Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-10-13 to 2026-10-14 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
74.4
Overbought
MACD Histogram
0.455
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$42.12
Resistance
$52.24
Bollinger %B
1.01
Above Upper Band
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$50.00 Above
EMA 21
$49.33 Above
EMA 50
$48.60 Above
EMA 200
$44.37 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
92
Growth
92
Profitability
84
Financial Health
58
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 12.5×
P/B Ratio 3.14×
PEG Ratio 0.29
Dividend Yield 3.48%
52W High $52.31
52W Low $29.68
Quality & Growth
ROE 2440.8%
ROA 1179.2%
Gross Margin 3504.4%
Operating Margin 3225.1%
Revenue Growth YoY —
Debt / Equity 0.37
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 12.5 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 3.1x; PEG ratio of 0.3 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 24.4%; Return on assets of 11.8%; Net margin of 24.9%; Gross margin of 35.0%; Current ratio of 1.00 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.37; Free cash flow per share is positive (4.69); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 14.0%; 3 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth accelerating (+42.7% -> +87.2% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full CNQ Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime