LNG · NYSE · STOCK
Cheniere Energy (LNG) Stock Analysis
$278.74
52W $186.20 – $300.89
55/100
$60.12B
21.3
-0.01
Is LNG Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) Watch with a composite score of 55/100
, based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement.
Last updated October 14, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +4.73 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -15.27 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 20 articles, 14d). Portfolio Manager remains cautious — sector concentration is already high (hhi 2802.55). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- ROE of 47.4% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
- Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 5.3x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 3.00 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- EPS declining -21.4% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- RSI at 74 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 3.00) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of October 14, 2026
Overall Committee Score
55/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 73%
of 93 Energy peers
Value Analyst
neutral
50
/ 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 47.4% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− Price-to-book of 5.3x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst
neutral
57
/ 100 · High confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive
− EPS declining -21.4% YoY despite any revenue growth
Technical Analyst
bullish
61
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− RSI at 74 is in overbought territory
Risk Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 3.00) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
bullish
65
/ 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst
bullish
66
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 20 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
bearish
30
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2802.55)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score weakened from 58.6 to 55.3.
- New bearish signals: 2 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 2 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 1 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: score 80->65 (-15).
- News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: score 69->61 (-8); +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-10-13 to 2026-10-14 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
55.2
Neutral
MACD Histogram
1.278
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$225.19
Resistance
$298.89
Bollinger %B
0.77
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$278.53
Above
EMA 21
$276.22
Above
EMA 50
$272.71
Above
EMA 200
$254.57
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
58
Growth
72
Profitability
87
Financial Health
3
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio
21.3×
P/B Ratio
9.69×
PEG Ratio
-0.99
Dividend Yield
0.77%
52W High
$300.89
52W Low
$186.20
Quality & Growth
ROE
6734.1%
ROA
1084.9%
Gross Margin
5294.2%
Operating Margin
4350.3%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
4.29
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 21.3 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 9.7x; PEG ratio of -1.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 67.3%; Return on assets of 10.8%; Net margin of 13.1%; Gross margin of 52.9%; Current ratio of 0.87 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 4.29; Free cash flow per share is positive (33.69); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 377.3%; EPS growth accelerating (-256.8% -> +187.5% QoQ); Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full LNG Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →