Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
MSGS · NYSE · STOCK

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) Stock Analysis

Communication Services Updated October 10, 2026
$403.22
52W $207.90 – $438.93
60/100
$9.69B
—
0.59
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
60/100
Conviction: Contested · 50% agreement · 6 analysts
+1.9%
-6.4%
0.29:1
Contested
⚠
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.

Is MSGS Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) Buy with a composite score of 60/100 , based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement. Last updated October 10, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +15.49 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -4.51 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. Portfolio Manager remains cautious — sector concentration is already high (hhi 2796.97). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
  • Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
  • Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
Bear Case
  • P/E of 1243.6 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
  • ROE of only -6.8% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
  • Current ratio of 0.50 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 10, 2026
Overall Committee Score
60/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 29%
of 55 Communication Services peers
Value Analyst neutral
44 / 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
− P/E of 1243.6 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst bullish
75 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive
Technical Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst neutral
58 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate risk -- no single red flag, but nothing that clearly de-risks the position either
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
− Current ratio of 0.50 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst neutral
55 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager bearish
30 / 100 · Moderate confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2796.97)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 61.2 to 59.5.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Technical Analyst: score 69->61 (-8); +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-10 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
50.1
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.025
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$377.36
Resistance
$410.72
Bollinger %B
0.56
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$404.04 Below
EMA 21
$401.89 Above
EMA 50
$397.26 Above
EMA 200
$350.64 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
33
Growth
68
Profitability
7
Financial Health
50
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio —
P/B Ratio -36.91×
PEG Ratio 14.56
Dividend Yield 0.00%
52W High $438.93
52W Low $207.90
Quality & Growth
ROE -294.7%
ROA 50.5%
Gross Margin 2774.4%
Operating Margin 250.2%
Revenue Growth YoY —
Debt / Equity -4.34
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 1257.2 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of -36.9x; PEG ratio of 14.6 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -2.9%; Return on assets of 0.5%; Net margin of 0.7%; Gross margin of 27.7%; Current ratio of 0.50 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of -4.34; Free cash flow per share is positive (2.39); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 87.5%; EPS growth accelerating (-329.4% -> +248.7% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 1757.1%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full MSGS Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime