PL · NYSE · STOCK
Planet Labs PBC (PL) Stock Analysis
$14.01
52W $10.52 – $51.76
51/100
$5.05B
-13.8
2.17
Is PL Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Planet Labs PBC (PL) Watch with a composite score of 51/100
, based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement.
Last updated October 14, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +8.91 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -11.09 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 44.1% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Value Analyst remains cautious — price-to-book of 40.6x prices in significant intangible value. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 44.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 40.6x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- ROE of only -93.1% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 2.37 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- RSI at 30 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup) — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bearish picture — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of October 14, 2026
Overall Committee Score
51/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 89%
of 227 Industrials peers
Value Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
− Price-to-book of 40.6x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst
bullish
83
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 44.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
Technical Analyst
bearish
39
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is deteriorating -- trend and/or momentum are working against this name
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.37) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
bullish
65
/ 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst
neutral
55
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager
bearish
35
/ 100 · Low confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score weakened from 54.8 to 51.1.
- Committee agreement increased notably from 33% to 50%.
- New bearish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 2 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Technical Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: score 80->65 (-15).
- Portfolio Manager: score 30->35 (+5).
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: stance neutral->bearish; score 46->39 (-8); +2 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-10-13 to 2026-10-14 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
24.1
Oversold
MACD Histogram
-0.083
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Support
$10.52
Resistance
$16.64
Bollinger %B
-0.18
Below Lower Band
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$16.15
Below
EMA 21
$16.90
Below
EMA 50
$19.14
Below
EMA 200
$23.04
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
67
Growth
92
Profitability
22
Financial Health
93
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio
-13.8×
P/B Ratio
9.66×
PEG Ratio
0.15
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$51.76
52W Low
$10.52
Quality & Growth
ROE
-13100.8%
ROA
-2154.7%
Gross Margin
5542.1%
Operating Margin
-2716.0%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.79
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of -13.8 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 9.7x; PEG ratio of 0.1 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -131.0%; Return on assets of -21.5%; Net margin of -95.1%; Gross margin of 55.4%; Current ratio of 2.84 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.79; Free cash flow per share is positive (0.07); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 180.3%; 5 consecutive earnings beats; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full PL Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →