SDRL · NYSE · STOCK
Seadrill (SDRL) Stock Analysis
$46.38
52W $28.10 – $55.47
65/100
$3.06B
—
1.40
⚠
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.
Is SDRL Bullish or Bearish?
Bullish.
Innellis AI committee rates Seadrill Limited (SDRL) Buy with a composite score of 65/100
, based on 6 analysts with 67% agreement.
Last updated October 14, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Strong Buy
- Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +9.93 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Watch
- Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -10.07 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Risk Analyst sees a compelling case — low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.21) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. Portfolio Manager remains cautious — 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 0.8x is a discount to asset value — Value
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 3052.9 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- ROE of only 0.0% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- RSI at 72 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of October 14, 2026
Overall Committee Score
65/100
Agreement
67%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Moderate
Sector Rank
Top 11%
of 93 Energy peers
Value Analyst
neutral
50
/ 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ Price-to-book of 0.8x is a discount to asset value
− P/E of 3052.9 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst
bullish
77
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution
Technical Analyst
bullish
61
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− RSI at 72 is in overbought territory
Risk Analyst
bullish
80
/ 100 · Low confidence
Risk profile is manageable -- leverage, volatility, and event exposure all look contained
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.21) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
Macro Analyst
bullish
65
/ 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager
bearish
35
/ 100 · Low confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 67.1 to 65.1.
- Conviction changed from contested to moderate.
- Committee agreement increased notably from 50% to 67%.
- New bearish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 2 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Technical Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: score 80->65 (-15).
- Portfolio Manager: score 30->35 (+5).
- Technical Analyst: stance neutral->bullish; +2 bearish signal(s); +3 bullish signal(s).
- Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-10-13 to 2026-10-14 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
53.8
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.275
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$37.35
Resistance
$50.93
Bollinger %B
0.66
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$46.53
Below
EMA 21
$46.39
Below
EMA 50
$46.19
Above
EMA 200
$43.10
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
67
Growth
92
Profitability
3
Financial Health
100
Cash Flow
15
Valuation
P/E Ratio
—
P/B Ratio
1.06×
PEG Ratio
-7.24
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$55.47
52W Low
$28.10
Quality & Growth
ROE
-269.4%
ROA
-195.1%
Gross Margin
2504.9%
Operating Margin
933.6%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.26
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 2450.0 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.1x; PEG ratio of -7.2 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -2.7%; Return on assets of -2.0%; Net margin of 0.1%; Gross margin of 25.0%; Current ratio of 2.50 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.26; Free cash flow per share is negative (-4.19); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 107.4%; 3 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth accelerating (-161.1% -> +527.3% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full SDRL Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →