Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
WES · NYSE · STOCK

Western Midstream Partners (WES) Stock Analysis

Energy Updated September 17, 2026
$46.92
52W $36.90 – $50.07
52/100
$19.51B
14.7
0.66
AI Committee Verdict
Watch
52/100
Conviction: Contested · 50% agreement · 6 analysts
+1.3%
-10.5%
0.12:1
Contested

Is WES Bullish or Bearish?

Mixed. Innellis AI committee rates Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) Watch with a composite score of 52/100 , based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement. Last updated September 17, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Buy
Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +7.57 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Reduce
Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -12.43 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 12 articles, 14d). Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 2.15) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • ROE of 34.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
  • Dividend yield of 7.9% pays you to wait — Value
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
  • Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
  • Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
  • News sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 12 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
  • Price-to-book of 4.0x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • Debt-to-equity of 2.15 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
  • EPS declining -2.5% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
  • Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
  • Price trading below the lower Bollinger Band -- stretched to the downside — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of September 17, 2026
Overall Committee Score
52/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 88%
of 93 Energy peers
Value Analyst neutral
50 / 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 34.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− Price-to-book of 4.0x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst bearish
40 / 100 · High confidence
Growth story is weak, decelerating, or inconsistent
− EPS declining -2.5% YoY despite any revenue growth
Technical Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst bearish
30 / 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.15) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst bullish
68 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 12 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager neutral
45 / 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2514.55)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 52.4 to 52.4.

Comparing 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-17 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
33.7
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.232
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$42.27
Resistance
$47.84
Bollinger %B
-0.02
Below Lower Band
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$48.38 Below
EMA 21
$48.35 Below
EMA 50
$47.42 Below
EMA 200
$43.99 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
85
Growth
38
Profitability
94
Financial Health
14
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 14.7×
P/B Ratio 4.41×
PEG Ratio -8.02
Dividend Yield 7.79%
52W High $50.07
52W Low $36.90
Quality & Growth
ROE 2908.6%
ROA 779.8%
Gross Margin 6647.3%
Operating Margin 3968.8%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 2.14
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 14.7 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 4.4x; PEG ratio of -8.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 29.1%; Return on assets of 7.8%; Net margin of 29.2%; Gross margin of 66.5%; Current ratio of 0.91 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 2.14; Free cash flow per share is positive (5.65); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 12.9%; 2 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+80.9% -> +16.5% QoQ); Analyst estimates flat over recent quarters
Get the Full WES Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime