AIG · NYSE · STOCK
American International Group (AIG) Stock Analysis
$77.04
52W $71.25 – $87.29
60/100
$40.85B
14.0
0.53
⚠
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.
Is AIG Bullish or Bearish?
Bullish.
Innellis AI committee rates American International Group (AIG) Buy with a composite score of 60/100
, based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement.
Last updated October 10, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Strong Buy
- Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +14.79 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Watch
- Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -5.21 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Value Analyst sees a compelling case — p/e of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market. Portfolio Manager remains cautious — sector concentration is already high (hhi 2796.97). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.1x is a discount to asset value — Value
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.22) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
Bear Case
- Revenue declining -4.2% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Current ratio of 0.04 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of October 10, 2026
Overall Committee Score
60/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 46%
of 211 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst
bullish
77
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ P/E of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market
Growth Analyst
neutral
43
/ 100 · High confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution
− Revenue declining -4.2% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now
Technical Analyst
bullish
61
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
Risk Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate risk -- no single red flag, but nothing that clearly de-risks the position either
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.22) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
− Current ratio of 0.04 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion
Macro Analyst
bullish
65
/ 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager
bearish
30
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2796.97)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 60.9 to 60.2.
- Conviction changed from moderate to contested.
- Committee agreement fell notably from 67% to 50%.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 1 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Risk Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Risk Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 62->58 (-4).
- Value Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-10 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
67.1
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.323
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$76.12
Resistance
$77.32
Bollinger %B
0.94
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$75.80
Above
EMA 21
$75.57
Above
EMA 50
$76.02
Above
EMA 200
$77.00
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
67
Growth
66
Profitability
39
Financial Health
73
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio
14.0×
P/B Ratio
1.01×
PEG Ratio
5.79
Dividend Yield
2.47%
52W High
$87.29
52W Low
$71.25
Quality & Growth
ROE
752.6%
ROA
192.0%
Gross Margin
3806.5%
Operating Margin
1395.8%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.22
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 14.0 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.0x; PEG ratio of 5.8 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 7.5%; Return on assets of 1.9%; Net margin of 11.1%; Gross margin of 38.1%; Current ratio of 1.36 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.22; Free cash flow per share is positive (7.21); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 2.9%; 5 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+7.7% -> -5.2% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 10.5%; Analyst estimates flat over recent quarters
Get the Full AIG Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →