Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
DOCU · NASDAQ · STOCK

Docusign (DOCU) Stock Analysis

Technology Updated October 16, 2026
$74.67
52W $40.16 – $77.60
57/100
$14.49B
46.4
0.86
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
57/100
Conviction: Moderate · 67% agreement · 6 analysts
+9.4%
-4.9%
1.91:1
Moderate

Is DOCU Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates Docusign (DOCU) Buy with a composite score of 57/100 , based on 6 analysts with 67% agreement. Last updated October 16, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +18.40 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -1.60 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case. Portfolio Manager remains cautious — sector concentration is already high (hhi 2739.42). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • ROE of 17.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
  • 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
  • MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
  • Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
  • Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
Bear Case
  • P/E of 43.5 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
  • Price-to-book of 5.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • RSI at 82 is in overbought territory — Technical
  • Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
  • Weekly RSI at 83 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
  • Current ratio of 0.73 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 16, 2026
Overall Committee Score
57/100
Agreement
67%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Moderate
Sector Rank
Top 58%
of 287 Technology peers
Value Analyst neutral
49 / 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 17.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− P/E of 43.5 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst bullish
60 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution
Technical Analyst neutral
58 / 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− RSI at 82 is in overbought territory
Risk Analyst neutral
50 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate risk -- no single red flag, but nothing that clearly de-risks the position either
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
− Current ratio of 0.73 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst neutral
58 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager bearish
30 / 100 · Moderate confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2739.42)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 57.9 to 56.6.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Portfolio Manager: +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Risk Analyst: score 58->50 (-8); +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Technical Analyst: +2 bearish signal(s).
  • Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-10-15 to 2026-10-16 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
81.9
Overbought
MACD Histogram
0.535
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$71.00
Resistance
$81.69
Bollinger %B
1.20
Above Upper Band
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$72.55 Above
EMA 21
$70.21 Above
EMA 50
$65.87 Above
EMA 200
$59.39 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
13
Growth
81
Profitability
76
Financial Health
50
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 46.4×
P/B Ratio 8.63×
PEG Ratio 2.21
Dividend Yield 0.00%
52W High $77.60
52W Low $40.16
Quality & Growth
ROE 1611.6%
ROA 730.8%
Gross Margin 7948.7%
Operating Margin 1196.1%
Revenue Growth YoY —
Debt / Equity 0.11
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 46.4 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 8.6x; PEG ratio of 2.2 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 16.1%; Return on assets of 7.3%; Net margin of 9.8%; Gross margin of 79.5%; Current ratio of 0.64 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.11; Free cash flow per share is positive (6.27); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 4.7%; 5 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth roughly steady (+7.9% -> +6.4% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 26.1%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full DOCU Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime