EQH · NASDAQ · STOCK
Equitable Holdings
$51.42
52W $35.20 – $55.24
52/100
$14.06B
-15.8
1.09
Is EQH Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Equitable Holdings (EQH) Watch with a composite score of 52/100
, based on 6 analysts with 33% agreement.
Last updated August 09, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +8.39 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -11.61 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — market regime is bullish (bull market -- normal position sizing). Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 12.12) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 9.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- ROE of only -198.2% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 12.12 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- Revenue declining -7.1% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
- Weekly RSI at 77 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 12.12) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of August 09, 2026
Overall Committee Score
52/100
Agreement
33%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 97%
of 142 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
− Price-to-book of 9.4x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst
neutral
50
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive
− Revenue declining -7.1% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now
Technical Analyst
bullish
68
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− Weekly RSI at 77 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too
Risk Analyst
bearish
30
/ 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 12.12) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
bullish
70
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
neutral
60
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager
neutral
55
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score weakened significantly from 70.8 to 51.6.
- Recommendation changed from Buy to Watch.
- High-conviction consensus weakened -- analysts became more divided.
- Committee agreement fell sharply from 75% to 33%.
- New bearish signals: 5 appeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Growth Analyst.
- New analyst(s) joined: Risk Analyst, Value Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Growth Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 85->50 (-35); +1 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst joined: bearish at 30.
- Value Analyst joined: bearish at 32.
Comparing 2026-08-08 to 2026-08-09 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
68.4
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.189
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$47.21
Resistance
$55.12
Bollinger %B
0.99
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$49.92
Above
EMA 21
$48.66
Above
EMA 50
$46.55
Above
EMA 200
$45.15
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
100
Growth
60
Profitability
50
Financial Health
50
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio
-15.8×
P/B Ratio
-18.27×
PEG Ratio
0.10
Dividend Yield
2.21%
52W High
$55.24
52W Low
$35.20
Quality & Growth
ROE
—
ROA
-43.4%
Gross Margin
7267.1%
Operating Margin
-574.7%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
-4.89
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of -15.8 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of -18.3x; PEG ratio of 0.1 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 1864.9%; Return on assets of -0.4%; Net margin of -8.7%; Gross margin of 72.7%; Current ratio of 0.00 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of -4.89; Free cash flow per share is positive (6.77); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 1.4%; EPS growth accelerating (-6.4% -> +4.9% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 54.5%; Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full EQH Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →