Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
OWL · NYSE · STOCK

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) Stock Analysis

Financial Services Updated October 16, 2026
$8.85
52W $7.95 – $17.30
52/100
$14.02B
75.4
1.21
AI Committee Verdict
Watch
52/100
Conviction: Contested · 33% agreement · 6 analysts
+23.3%
-6.1%
3.82:1
Contested

Is OWL Bullish or Bearish?

Mixed. Innellis AI committee rates Blue Owl Capital (OWL) Watch with a composite score of 52/100 , based on 6 analysts with 33% agreement. Last updated October 16, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Buy
Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +7.96 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Reduce
Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -12.04 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — eps growing 28.7% yoy. Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 172.8 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • Dividend yield of 4.1% pays you to wait — Value
  • EPS growing 28.7% YoY — Growth
  • 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
  • MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
  • Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
  • P/E of 172.8 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
  • Price-to-book of 10.6x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • ROE of only 3.8% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
  • Debt-to-equity of 1.51 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
  • Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
  • High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.51) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 16, 2026
Overall Committee Score
52/100
Agreement
33%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 89%
of 211 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst bearish
29 / 100 · High confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
+ Dividend yield of 4.1% pays you to wait
− P/E of 172.8 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst bullish
79 / 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ EPS growing 28.7% YoY
Technical Analyst neutral
56 / 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst bearish
32 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.51) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst neutral
51 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
− News sentiment is negative (-0.20 across 27 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager bearish
30 / 100 · Moderate confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2739.42)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 51.3 to 52.0.

Analyst-level changes:
  • News Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Technical Analyst: score 49->56 (+8).
  • Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-10-15 to 2026-10-16 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
37.9
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.043
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$8.31
Resistance
$10.91
Bollinger %B
0.26
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$9.14 Below
EMA 21
$9.46 Below
EMA 50
$9.96 Below
EMA 200
$11.28 Below

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
25
Growth
68
Profitability
34
Financial Health
8
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 75.4×
P/B Ratio 3.09×
PEG Ratio 3.15
Dividend Yield 10.14%
52W High $17.30
52W Low $7.95
Quality & Growth
ROE 357.5%
ROA 63.2%
Gross Margin 6106.6%
Operating Margin 2260.2%
Revenue Growth YoY —
Debt / Equity 2.18
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 75.4 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 3.1x; PEG ratio of 3.1 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 3.6%; Return on assets of 0.6%; Net margin of 2.7%; Gross margin of 61.1%; Current ratio of 0.32 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 2.18; Free cash flow per share is positive (1.92); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 0.5%; 3 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth accelerating (-20.8% -> +15.8% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 4.8%; Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full OWL Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime