Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
SOUN · NASDAQ · STOCK

SoundHound AI (SOUN) Stock Analysis

Technology Updated October 14, 2026
$4.69
52W $4.85 – $22.17
60/100
$2.13B
-14.6
2.86
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
60/100
Conviction: Contested · 50% agreement · 6 analysts
+80.3%
Contested

Is SOUN Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) Buy with a composite score of 60/100 , based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement. Last updated October 14, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +15.29 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -4.71 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 54.6% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Portfolio Manager remains cautious — 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • Revenue growing 54.6% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
  • Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
  • Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
  • News sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 43 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
  • Price-to-book of 9.0x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • ROE of only -30.2% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
  • Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
  • RSI at 13 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup) — Technical
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
  • Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bearish picture — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 14, 2026
Overall Committee Score
60/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 40%
of 287 Technology peers
Value Analyst neutral
43 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
− Price-to-book of 9.0x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst bullish
85 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 54.6% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
Technical Analyst neutral
41 / 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst neutral
58 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate risk -- no single red flag, but nothing that clearly de-risks the position either
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
− Bollinger bandwidth of 24.6% signals elevated volatility
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst bullish
66 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 43 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager bearish
35 / 100 · Low confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 61.9 to 59.7.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: score 80->65 (-15).
  • News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: score 30->35 (+5).
  • Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Technical Analyst: +2 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-10-13 to 2026-10-14 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
9.6
Oversold
MACD Histogram
-0.106
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Bollinger %B
-0.16
Below Lower Band
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$5.25 Below
EMA 21
$5.67 Below
EMA 50
$6.17 Below
EMA 200
$7.86 Below

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
86
Growth
66
Profitability
11
Financial Health
100
Cash Flow
15
Valuation
P/E Ratio -14.6×
P/B Ratio 4.26×
PEG Ratio 0.01
Dividend Yield 0.00%
52W High $22.17
52W Low $4.85
Quality & Growth
ROE -302.0%
ROA -203.5%
Gross Margin 3736.9%
Operating Margin -8968.1%
Revenue Growth YoY —
Debt / Equity 0.01
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of -14.6 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 4.3x; PEG ratio of 0.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -3.0%; Return on assets of -2.0%; Net margin of -67.5%; Gross margin of 37.4%; Current ratio of 3.91 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.01; Free cash flow per share is negative (-0.28); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 64.9%; EPS growth accelerating (-200.0% -> +66.7% QoQ); Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full SOUN Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime