Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
EL · NYSE · STOCK

Estée Lauder Companies (EL) Stock Analysis

Consumer Defensive Updated October 10, 2026
$98.03
52W $66.22 – $121.64
50/100
$35.46B
192.3
1.27
AI Committee Verdict
Watch
50/100
Conviction: Contested · 50% agreement · 6 analysts
+5.5%
-7.3%
0.75:1
Contested

Is EL Bullish or Bearish?

Mixed. Innellis AI committee rates Estée Lauder Companies (The) (EL) Watch with a composite score of 50/100 , based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement. Last updated October 10, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Buy
Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +9.52 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Reduce
Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -10.48 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 27 articles, 14d). Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 193.4 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
  • MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
  • Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
  • News sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 27 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
  • P/E of 193.4 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
  • Price-to-book of 7.5x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • ROE of only 4.6% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
  • Debt-to-equity of 1.92 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
  • Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
  • High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.92) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 10, 2026
Overall Committee Score
50/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 84%
of 72 Consumer Defensive peers
Value Analyst bearish
29 / 100 · High confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
− P/E of 193.4 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst neutral
52 / 100 · High confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
Risk Analyst bearish
30 / 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.92) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst bullish
66 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 27 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager bearish
30 / 100 · Moderate confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2796.97)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 48.9 to 50.5.

Analyst-level changes:
  • News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Technical Analyst: stance neutral->bullish; score 54->61 (+8); +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-10 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
64.8
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.051
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$90.89
Resistance
$103.37
Bollinger %B
0.81
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$94.75 Above
EMA 21
$95.13 Above
EMA 50
$93.86 Above
EMA 200
$90.44 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
33
Growth
65
Profitability
35
Financial Health
19
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 192.3×
P/B Ratio 9.35×
PEG Ratio 0.74
Dividend Yield 1.43%
52W High $121.64
52W Low $66.22
Quality & Growth
ROE 478.2%
ROA 92.1%
Gross Margin 7550.0%
Operating Margin 1114.4%
Revenue Growth YoY —
Debt / Equity 2.43
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 192.3 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 9.4x; PEG ratio of 0.7 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 4.8%; Return on assets of 0.9%; Net margin of 1.2%; Gross margin of 75.5%; Current ratio of 1.22 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 2.43; Free cash flow per share is positive (3.62); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 18.4%; 5 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+2.2% -> -57.1% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 333.3%; Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full EL Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime