LVS · NYSE · STOCK
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) Stock Analysis
$37.94
52W $35.28 – $70.45
55/100
$23.99B
14.4
0.77
Is LVS Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Las Vegas Sands (LVS) Watch with a composite score of 55/100
, based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement.
Last updated October 14, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +4.63 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -15.37 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 9.93) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.9 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 139.8% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 29.6% YoY — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 27.7x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 9.93 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bearish picture — Technical
- Weekly RSI at 22 -- oversold on the larger timeframe too — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of October 14, 2026
Overall Committee Score
55/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 57%
of 178 Consumer Cyclical peers
Value Analyst
neutral
55
/ 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ P/E of 13.9 is inexpensive for the broad market
− Price-to-book of 27.7x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst
bullish
62
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ EPS growing 29.6% YoY
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst
neutral
56
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 9.93) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
bullish
65
/ 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst
bullish
62
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
Portfolio Manager
bearish
35
/ 100 · Low confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 55.0 to 55.4.
- New bearish signals: 2 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 2 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 2 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 5 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: News Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: score 80->65 (-15).
- News Analyst: stance neutral->bullish.
- Portfolio Manager: score 30->35 (+5).
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: score 41->56 (+15); +1 bearish signal(s); +1 bullish signal(s).
- Value Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-10-13 to 2026-10-14 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
44.3
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.189
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Bollinger %B
0.38
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$36.81
Above
EMA 21
$38.16
Below
EMA 50
$41.11
Below
EMA 200
$48.16
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
67
Growth
37
Profitability
79
Financial Health
8
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio
14.4×
P/B Ratio
42.14×
PEG Ratio
0.47
Dividend Yield
3.10%
52W High
$70.45
52W Low
$35.28
Quality & Growth
ROE
10232.7%
ROA
742.2%
Gross Margin
5088.6%
Operating Margin
2334.7%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
26.27
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 14.4 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 42.1x; PEG ratio of 0.5 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 102.3%; Return on assets of 7.4%; Net margin of 12.8%; Gross margin of 50.9%; Current ratio of 1.00 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 26.27; Free cash flow per share is positive (4.22); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 21.9%; EPS growth decelerating (+7.1% -> -35.2% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of -25.3%; Analyst estimates flat over recent quarters
Get the Full LVS Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →